Diane Hunt, chief health information officer at Mount Nantany, discusses the implementation of Epic at the health system, highlighting the transition’s challenges, successes, and future steps. Hunt emphasizes the importance of governance, cultural alignment, and clinician involvement in the project’s success. She notes that the health system’s culture, which encouraged broad engagement from staff and clinicians, played a critical role in making the transition smoother than expected. One of the key challenges was the data migration from the legacy system, which remains an ongoing issue due to a shortage of experts in that area. Hunt also highlights the successful integration of AI tools like “Chart with Art,” which has significantly improved efficiency for clinicians. The health system’s marketing department played an important role in ensuring high engagement with the patient portal, MyChart, achieving a 45% engagement rate just weeks after go-live. Hunt emphasizes the evolving role of physician leadership in health IT transformation, stressing the value of physician informaticists as translators between technical and clinical teams. Looking ahead, the health system plans to focus on optimization and refining governance structures to support post-go-live operations.
Mount Nantany’s transition to Epic has been marked by a strong collaborative approach, with over 80 work groups formed to ensure all stakeholders had a voice in shaping workflows and system configurations. These groups included clinicians, IT staff, and operational leaders, with decisions flowing upward through clinical and executive steering committees. Hunt praises the health system’s ability to empower frontline workers in decision-making, which she describes as a “really empowering process.” She also notes the early success of AI tools, which have exceeded initial expectations and are already making a measurable impact on clinical workflows. Despite the challenges with data migration, Hunt remains optimistic about the long-term benefits of the transition, citing improvements in efficiency, data availability, and patient care. The health system’s next steps include forming optimization committees in mid-July to ensure the system is used as intended and to leverage Epic’s analytics capabilities for continuous improvement.
Related: OCR Criticizes Weak Risk Analyses in Breach Settlements
Hunt reflects on the broader implications of the transition, noting that the integration of AI tools and data analytics has brought the vision of improved patient care and efficiency to fruition. She emphasizes the importance of physician leadership and clinician engagement in health IT projects, drawing on her own experience in clinical informatics to highlight the value of having physicians who can bridge the gap between technical and clinical needs. Hunt also acknowledges the support from Epic, which she credits as a key factor in the successful go-live. Despite the initial challenges, she remains confident in the health system’s trajectory, stating that the transition has set a strong foundation for future innovation and improvement in care delivery.
Mount Nantany’s approach to the transition has involved significant collaboration across departments. The health system’s leadership prioritized transparency, ensuring that all stakeholders understood the goals and timelines of the project. This clarity helped maintain momentum throughout the implementation phase, even when unexpected obstacles arose. The health system’s IT team worked closely with clinicians to tailor the system to the specific needs of different departments, which reduced resistance to change. This process, while time-consuming, ultimately strengthened the relationship between IT and clinical teams, creating a more cohesive work environment. The health system’s focus on continuous feedback has also allowed for quick adjustments, ensuring that the transition remains aligned with the organization’s evolving priorities.
Related: AI listening aids rural New Mexico hospital care
The transition to Epic has required the health system to invest in training and support for staff at all levels. This includes not only technical training on the new system but also guidance on how to use it effectively in daily workflows. The health system has implemented a peer-to-peer training model, where experienced users mentor their colleagues, supporting a culture of shared learning. This approach has been particularly effective in reducing the learning curve for new users, allowing them to become proficient more quickly. The health system has also established a dedicated help desk to address technical issues promptly, ensuring that disruptions to patient care are minimized. These efforts have contributed to a smoother transition, with clinicians reporting higher satisfaction with the new system than initially anticipated.
Mount Nantany’s experience with the transition highlights the importance of strategic planning in large-scale health IT projects. The health system’s leadership recognized early on that a one-size-fits-all approach would not work, so they tailored their implementation strategy to the unique needs of each department. This flexibility has allowed the health system to adapt to challenges as they arose, rather than being forced into rigid processes that may not have worked. The health system has also prioritized the integration of new technologies, such as AI tools, to enhance clinical workflows and improve patient outcomes. These innovations have not only improved efficiency but also helped the health system maintain its commitment to high-quality care. The lessons learned from this transition are being documented and shared with other health systems considering similar projects.
Related: FQHCs Use Agentic AI to Streamline Scheduling
The health system’s leadership has emphasized the importance of ongoing evaluation and improvement in the post-implementation phase. This includes regular assessments of system performance, user feedback, and the impact of the transition on patient care. The health system has established a continuous improvement framework that allows for the identification of areas where further optimization is needed. This framework includes regular meetings between IT, clinical, and administrative leaders to discuss progress and address any concerns. The health system’s commitment to this process has ensured that the transition remains a dynamic and evolving project, rather than a one-time event. This approach has helped the health system stay ahead of emerging challenges and opportunities, ensuring that the benefits of the transition continue to be realized over time.
