Faculty walking into classrooms early to troubleshoot AV gear has become a routine part of campus life. A professor might find the camera pointed at an empty wall, the projection screen stuck, or the display on the wrong input. Somewhere in IT, a technician is already heading over to fix it.
Most institutions have accepted this friction as the price of running modern classrooms. According to a report from the outlet, it’s actually the result of building technology environments on a weak foundation — and it’s preventable. The gap between what a room promises during a demo and what it delivers daily isn’t a technology problem. It’s an infrastructure problem.
Why Buying Better Gear Doesn’t Fix the Room
Campus AV procurement often works backward. An architect sets the room’s initial design, sometimes without consulting the AV team, and locks in a budget before anyone asks what the space actually needs to do. Committees may debate brand choices, but the physical layout rarely gets the same scrutiny. The AV team then scrambles to mount, rack, cable, and power everything after the purchase orders are signed.
Related: Cybersecurity Challenges Mount for Higher Education
The report compares this to buying a high-performance sports car and discovering the road is full of potholes. When display mounting systems, cabling pathways, rack enclosures, power management, signal distribution, and wireless network infrastructure are treated as afterthoughts, the result is predictable: spaces that work intermittently, require constant attention, and can’t adapt when teaching models change.
This pattern is surprisingly common across higher education. Many schools have spent heavily on the visible pieces — interactive displays, cameras, microphones — while neglecting the hidden layer that makes those components reliable. The result is a collection of expensive gear that never quite works as a system.
Building the Foundation First
The shift required is straightforward but significant. Rather than picking technologies and building around them, institutions that design for reliability start with a different question: What does this room need to do? What teaching formats must it support? How will it be serviced? How will it scale?
Related: AI Use Expands in Healthcare Settings
When those questions drive procurement, every layer of infrastructure becomes an architectural decision. That includes display and projector mounting, projection screens, rack systems and power distribution, structured cabling and cable management, PTZ and fixed cameras, wireless access points, and floor connectivity systems for flexible spaces.
The practical payoff is standardization. When infrastructure decisions are made intentionally and consistently, IT teams stop troubleshooting one-off configurations and start managing a coherent system. A technician who understands the rack layout and power distribution in Building A also understands Building F. The report calls that not just efficiency but sanity. When infrastructure is the variable, technology becomes the constant.
Designing learning environments this way doesn’t mean overhauling everything at once. It means changing the sequence of decisions and expanding what counts as an AV decision in the first place. A mounting bracket, a cable pathway, a power outlet — these are not details to sort out later. They are the foundation that determines whether a million dollars of AV gear actually works.
